Editorial endorsement 2020: Vote ‘yes’ on Portland charter amendment for police accountability

Portland Police Bureau

The Portland Police Bureau's Central Precinct. (Maxine Bernstein/Staff)

If there’s one message that has come through loud and clear all year, it’s that Portlanders want true accountability for police. Portland City Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty’s proposed amendment to enshrine a new police oversight system into the city charter, Measure 26-217, is the city council’s biggest step forward to date. Despite some significant flaws, Portland residents should vote “yes.”

The measure calls for creating an independent commission of community members to investigate complaints against police as well as deadly force incidents. The commission would be able to subpoena officers to testify and have the authority to discipline officers, including firing them. It would operate independently of any bureau and could receive no less than 5% of the police bureau’s budget.

We wish the city had taken more time both to develop the structure as well as ensure its viability. Because the biggest obstacles to accountability aren’t in the city charter, but rather in state law and the police union contract. Unless those are changed to foster greater transparency and to give an independent citizens' body authority to make disciplinary decisions – a hugely difficult lift – residents won’t see any better outcomes than they do now. Enshrining budget decisions into the city charter is also a bad precedent, as it binds future city councils in handling one of its most basic responsibilities – figuring out how to pay for the city’s top needs in any given year.

That said, a vote for an independent police oversight body marks both a change in approach and a message to the police union of where the community stands. We expect that the committee tasked with implementing the system would be able to identify problems that may require other changes that voters would then need to vote on. It’s far from ideal, but it provides a better path forward than the status quo.

- The Oregonian/OregonLive Editorial Board

To read other voting recommendations for the November election, visit our main endorsements page.


Oregonian editorials
Editorials reflect the collective opinion of The Oregonian/OregonLive editorial board, which operates independently of the newsroom. Members of the editorial board are Therese Bottomly, Laura Gunderson, Helen Jung, John Maher and Amy Wang.
Members of the board meet regularly to determine our institutional stance on issues of the day. We publish editorials when we believe our unique perspective can lend clarity and influence an upcoming decision of great public interest. Editorials are opinion pieces and therefore different from news articles.
To respond to this editorial, submit an OpEd or a letter to the editor.
If you have questions about the opinion section, email Helen Jung, opinion editor, or call 503-294-7621.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.