Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Theresa May at the Conservative conference
Theresa May at the Conservative conference: she will make another statement to the Commons on Monday on the talks. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images
Theresa May at the Conservative conference: she will make another statement to the Commons on Monday on the talks. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

A party at war: could Brexit split spell end of the Tories?

This article is more than 5 years old

Theresa May’s troubles seem to mount by the week as she tries to hold her divided party together. And some believe the divisions are so deep it could be damaged for ever as a force in UK politics

Last Wednesday evening, after news filtered through from Brussels that Theresa May was open to the idea of extending the post-Brexit transition period beyond December 2020, a senior Tory minister could not handle the volume of phone calls and texts he was receiving late into the night from fellow MPs. “In the end I had to just switch the bloody thing off,” he said. “It was all kicking off yet again.”

The next day Tory Leavers and Remainers held rival meetings in the House of Commons to plot their responses. Hardliners were as deeply divided as ever. But the vast majority of Tory MPs from all sides were united about one thing: this was another huge Brexit blunder by the prime minister.

“Part of me was thinking that I was going to have to fire off a letter calling for a vote of no confidence in the woman,” said one ardent Remainer.

“It is her dithering, her prevarication, her lack of bravery and leadership that had finally made me think she had to go, that she was really the problem. But then I thought whooooa ... whooooa ... wait a minute, maybe that’s not right. Who would we get instead? What about the country? Take a breath. Be careful what you wish for.”

May will make yet another statement to the Commons on Monday on her disastrously deadlocked Brexit negotiations. Last Monday she had to do the same, standing up and telling MPs how a dash to Brussels by her Brexit secretary Dominic Raab the day before had failed to secure any breakthrough on the Irish border.

MPs admire her stamina as she and ministers shuttle gamely to and from the Belgian capital, but they increasingly wonder if there is any guiding purpose.

This time May will report to MPs on a summit in Brussels last week – billed beforehand as the moment of truth when a Brexit deal simply had to be done, but ending up with the EU and UK still unable to agree, and everything being put off again.

Before the summit, in an attempt to be helpful, EU leaders had floated the idea that the 20-month post-Brexit transition period, during which the UK will effectively remain inside the European Union’s economic system in order to smooth our path out, could be extended well into 2021.

This, they thought, would give everyone extra time to conclude a long-term EU-UK trade deal and sort out issues on the Irish border. When the summit got under way, May appeared at first to be very open to the idea. But she was far more circumspect after learning how her MPs were reacting back home. Most were appalled, Remainers and Leavers alike.

One senior Conservative MP who favours the softest of Brexits said: “The very idea that May could entertain an extension and say so out of the blue shows how completely intellectually redundant No 10 is. You do not achieve anything by simply putting things back, by stopping the clock. British people and British businesses just want to get on with it, to get this over. They want to find a deal, whatever it is. What on earth is an extra few months on the end of the transition going to achieve?”

Another Tory moderate added: “You could guess the reaction of the hard Brexiters the moment the word ‘extension’ was uttered. Months or years more as a vassal state, more billions to Brussels. Brexit delayed. Of course they would reject it outright.” As indeed they did.

Cabinet ministers had not been briefed on an extension either, so many of them on the Brexiter wing were angry.

Their allies on the backbenches took to Twitter. Nick Boles, who is close to Michael Gove, the environment secretary, said: “Lots of talk about the idea of extending the ‘limbo’ transition for another year in order to avoid the backstop kicking in. This is MADNESS. We would have to pay extra contributions of around €17 billion.”

An ally of Michael Gove dismissed the idea of extending the transition period as madness. Photograph: Will Oliver/EPA

Boles added in another tweet: “It would be so much better to go into EEA/EFTA from next March – our contributions would be lower and we would only need to bring it to an end when we had negotiated a satisfactory future relationship.”

Scottish Tories reacted furiously, too, making clear that any delay to the UK reclaiming control of Scottish fishing waters would be unacceptable and harm the party ahead of the Holyrood elections in 2021.

The Scottish secretary, David Mundell, suggested he would resign if there were any further delay, while Johnny Mercer, a backbench Tory MP seen by some as a future potential high flyer, described the government as a “shitshow” in a sign of how discipline had totally broken down.

This weekend – after more than half a million people marched through London calling for a second referendum on Brexit, the Conservative party – the most successful political fighting force in British history – is bitterly divided over our future in Europe and over who should be its leader, just when the country needs it to show maximum unity, clarity and strength of purpose. “We are essentially dysfunctional at a moment of national crisis,” was how one ex-minister, recently resigned from the government, put it.

Amid the factionalism there are still some Tory loyalist voices and pragmatists who are calling desperately for common sense to prevail, and for Conservatives to put their country first. The Foreign Office minister Alan Duncan said that if they failed to come together and compromise they could do untold damage to the UK – and their party. He had never known a moment where it was more urgent for ideologues in all camps to “get real”.

“There simply is no outcome that will satisfy everyone,” he said. “People have to step back from their ideological obsessions and accept a pragmatic compromise on Brexit. Otherwise we risk inflicting massive economic damage on ourselves, as well as political damage both domestically and internationally.”

It was essential that Tory MPs got behind May, whatever their views on Europe. “I have lived through our party’s battles over the Maastricht treaty but I have never known the country at such a perilous moment as we face today,” he said. “People [really] have got to stand back and look at the national interest. Among MPs there are too many factions, too much fighting, too much jostling, too much calculation – and not enough clear thinking.”

“The prime minister is in a very difficult position. All of those who carp at her are not in any position to do any better. If we were to replace the prime minister with any of those who criticise her, those same people would be in exactly the same position, facing the same difficulties.”

But there is no absolutely no sign that enough Conservatives will do as he wants. In fact, the nearer the crisis point on Brexit comes – parliamentary deadlock leading to no deal – the more entrenched many Tories become in their ideological dugouts. Some say David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, is now “on manoeuvres” and that his allies want him to take over from May as a caretaker leader as soon as possible.

Others say Michael Gove and his acolytes are cosying up not just to Brexiters but also to key Remainers to try to win them around to the idea of a Gove premiership with pledges of preferment.

More and more Tory MPs are said to be sending letters expressing no confidence in May to Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the 1922 committee of Tory backbenchers, who needs 48 such letters to trigger a leadership challenge.

Robbie Gibb, May’s director of communications, has been trying to halt the drift of opinion against her by holding dinners in No 10 with groups of eight or so backbenchers at a time, trying to talk them round to what should be normal – loyalty to their leader.

The next fortnight will be critical for May, the Tory party and the country. In eight days’ time, Philip Hammond will deliver his autumn budget with little money to spend and with the Democratic Unionists, upon who May relies to give her a majority in parliament, threatening to vote it down unless she bows to their will over Brexit.

Budget day will demonstrate how hamstrung the chancellor is, financially and politically, as a result of the whole debate over leaving the European Union.

Yesterday the Tory chair of the Treasury select committee, Nicky Morgan, warned that the party was under “existential strain” and said that some friendships would never be healed. She too called on hard Brexiters to see the need for compromise.

The result of not doing so, some Tories believe, will not just be a disastrous no-deal Brexit but possibly the end of the Tory party as a formidable force in British politics.

Activists outside the Brexit bubble are desperate for the party to settle it and start talking about other issues. “When Europe dominates the discussion in the Conservative party for too long, it leads to deep division and defeat,” said Ryan Shorthouse, founder of Bright Blue, a thinktank for promoting liberal Conservatism.

“Just look at the disappointing result of the last election, which the prime minister pitched as about Brexit. If Conservative MPs want to win in 2022, they would be wise to compromise and agree to a future deal with the EU as soon as possible. And, ultimately, move on.”

Jeremy Hunt. Photograph: Paul Ellis/AFP/Getty Images

May loyalists

Alan Duncan

Jeremy Hunt

Karen Bradley

 A dwindling number, perhaps - but there are plenty of Tory MPs and ministers who are deeply sympathetic with the prime minister’s plight and who, like her, take a non-ideological approach to European issues. While driven groups of hard Brexiters and Remainers fight it out around them, the foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt and like-minded colleagues simply want MPs in their own party to unite behind a sensible Brexit solution that would pass through parliament, perhaps with the help of some Labour MPs, and allow the Conservative party and country to move on and think about something other than Europe and Brexit.

Kenneth Clarke. Photograph: Chris McAndrew

Hard Remainers

Kenneth Clarke

Antoinette Sandbach

Dominic Grieve

This group would prefer the UK to stay in the European Union if at all possible, believing that no exit deal that Theresa May can strike can be as good as the status quo. Kenneth Clarke has been a consistent, outspoken Europhile throughout his many years serving as a minister in the governments of Margaret Thatcher, John Major and David Cameron. He does not, however, back a second referendum, being a firm believer that politicians are elected to make the tough decisions. This group has been in the forefront of efforts to amend Brexit legislation so that the UK at least stays in the customs union and single market after we leave.

Andrea Jenkyns. Photograph: Matt Crossick/Empics Entertainment

Hard Brexiters

Jacob Rees-Mogg

Andrea Jenkyns

Bernard Jenkin

The likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg and Andrea Jenkyns believe that only by leaving the EU can the UK restore control of its borders and take control of its economic destiny. They say any compromises that would see us staying in the customs union or single market would be a betrayal of the people’s will. If we remained in the customs union, the UK would be unable to strike its own trade deals around the world. These hardline anti-EU Tories are unwilling to bend. They believe a second referendum, rather than being a democratic move, would send a message that the establishment always refuses to listen.

Anna Soubry. Photograph: Ken McKay/Rex/Shutterstock

Second-vote supporters

Anna Soubry

Justine Greening

Phillip Lee

Tories such as the Broxtowe MP Anna Soubry are ardent pro-Europeans but now believe the only way to break the Brexit deadlock and settle the question of the UK’s future relationship with Europe is to put the whole deadlocked issue back to the people. All take the view that now that the difficulties of delivering Brexit, and the potential consequences, are better understood, the people deserve a say before the decision is finally made. They argue that young people in particular deserve the right to a vote on their futures, and that the Leave campaign in 2016 misled people into thinking Brexit would be quick, simple, and would deliver benefits for all. 

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed