ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: North Dakota regulators owe the public a better explanation for spill underreporting

Dave Glatt
Dave Glatt, the environmental health section chief for the Department of Health, talks Thursday, July 18, 2013, about the state's efforts to crack down on oil waste in western North Dakota. (TJ Jerke/Forum News Service)

“I get it – people want more information.”

That’s what North Dakota Environmental Quality Chief Dave Glatt told the Associated Press , responding to controversy over a situation were hundreds of thousands of gallons of liquid natural gas was described as merely 10 gallons in an official state report.

But does Glatt get it? So far his explanations for how this situation came to be are pretty lame.

He and his agency have said that the 10 gallon figure was just the initial report, and it would somehow be illegal to change that record. While it is against state law to alter a public record, there was nothing stopping Glatt and his agency from issuing subsequent reports and updates to give a clearer picture as to what happened.

The it’s-illegal-to-change-the-record explanation comes off as insultingly evasive.

ADVERTISEMENT

Does Mr. Glatt think the public is stupid? C’mon.

Click here to continue reading Rob Port's Say Anything blog.

Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT