Live

Ukraine war latest: 'Undeclared Russian military intelligence officer' expelled from UK

The Home Office has expelled a Russian defence attaché as part of a series of measures against Moscow. James Cleverly said the attaché was an "undeclared military intelligence officer". Ask our military analysts or international correspondents a question in the box below.

Why you can trust Sky News
Russia vows 'appropriate response' after UK expulsion of defence attache

The Russian embassy in London has said there will be "an appropriate response" after Britain expelled a Russian defence attache.

The embassy said the restrictions that had been imposed were done under a "groundless and ridiculous pretext", according to Russian state news agency TASS.

It comes after Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova was reported as telling journalists that the Kremlin will respond appropriately following the expulsion.

Analysis: Russia may have crossed the line - but UK move to expel attache increases risk of dangerous escalation

Dominic Waghorn, international affairs editor

It's always assumed defence attaches play some kind of role gatherling intelligence and that is generally tolerated by their host countries. 

They could be gathering data about weapons production for instance or ship building but there is a line they are expected not to cross. 

The assumption here is that the Russians have broken the rules of the game.

But the British government will have thought long and hard before expelling the Russian. It doesn't come without cost.

In their day jobs defence attaches play a crucial role in liaising with their hosts.  That can be very important in terms of avoiding misunderstandings that could lead to unnecessary and dangerous escalation. 

Losing Russia’s defence attache in London deprives the UK of one more line of liaison at a time when clear understanding and clarification could be essential to avoiding deepening conflict.

That is not ideal at a time of war. 

What is not clear is how much these moves are connected specifically to the conduct of the Russians involved or should they actually be seen more as another chapter in the diplomatic war underway between Russia and the UK.

The UK has undoubtedly weakened Russia's ability to spy in the UK and gather intelligence but these measures will also affect Britain's ability to predict and avoid potential escalation. 

That will be made even worse if Russia, as may be expected, responds with like-for-like retaliation

Children among seven injured by Russian shelling Kharkiv, governor says

Seven people have been injured by Russian shelling in eastern Kharkiv, according to the region's governor.

Oleg Synegubov said among those wounded was an eight-year-old girl and three boys, two aged 14 and the other 15. 

"Two [of the] boys are in serious condition, [the other] boy and [the] girl are in average condition," he said. 

One 55-year-old civilian of unspecified gender was also hospitalised. 

Two women had minor injuries. 

'We will not tolerate Putin's efforts to undermine our nation,' Shapps says

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has offered his thoughts on the expulsion of a Russian defence attache the government has accused of being an undeclared military intelligence officer. 

"Today we've expelled Russia's defence attache who has been working as an intelligence officer for Putin in the UK," he said on X. 

"We will not tolerate Putin’s efforts to undermine our nation and democracy and will continue to stand up for freedom here and in Ukraine."

Your questions answered: Why is Ukraine targeting Russian oil refineries over the frontline?

Each week we ask readers for their questions on the war for our military analysts and international correspondents.

This week, military analyst Sean Bell answers:

Why is Ukraine focusing its drone attacks on oil refineries rather than near the front lines?
Mike

Thanks, Mike, for this topical question.

Although the ultimate metric of success in this brutal war is territory gained, to achieve that outcome requires a more complex strategy than simply focusing on the frontline battle.

One of the reasons that the Royal Air Force was formed as an independent service was the recognition that greater impact could often be achieved by targeting enemy logistics and supply lines behind the frontline, rather than simply focusing effort on the "close battle".  

Military action is ultimately driven by political will to achieve a desired end-state; the military simply creates the conditions in which a political outcome can be achieved.  

At the tactical level of warfare, the focus is on the battles of individual soldiers and units prevailing against tactical targets.

However, at the other end of the spectrum, senior military strategists seek to attack the enemy's "centre of gravity" - the one thing that the enemy cannot afford to lose and thus must protect at all costs.

'Fight smarter'

In the Second World War, much of the Allied bombing effort was targeting German industrial capacity, as without the ability to regenerate military equipment and ammunition, the war would not be sustainable.  

Ukraine has a smaller army than Russia, and so any conventional attritional battle would favour Russia.

Therefore, Ukraine has to try to "fight smarter" and erode Russia's will - or capacity - to fight.  

A war on this scale consumes huge quantities of resource, which has to be funded in some way.  

Russia's oil exports fund Vladimir Putin's military campaign and also pay for imports of vital munitions from North Korea and Iran.  

By targeting the enemy's oil facilities Ukraine will be aiming to reduce Russia's export capacity, which in turn impacts Russia's ability to fund the war.  

That might not help the close battle, but could undermine Russia's commitment to a longer-duration conflict.

And, although drones are an "irritation" to the frontline forces, the quantity of explosives they are able to deliver is relatively small, so their effect is relatively limited.  

However, an oil facility is very vulnerable to a relatively small-scale explosion, which can spread swiftly to destroy a crucial part of Russia's critical national infrastructure - more bang per buck.

So, although Ukraine desperately needs to stop Russia from breaking through its frontlines, we can expect to see Ukraine continue to target energy infrastructure as part of a broader strategy in its war with Russia.

Identity of 'undeclared Russian military intelligence officer' revealed

We now have more details regarding the freshly expelled Russian defence attache we reported on in our 1.10pm post. 

The attache accused by the Home Office of being an undeclared military intelligence officer spying for the Kremlin is Colonel Maxim Elovik. 

EU have framework to use frozen Russian funds for Ukraine

European Union diplomats have agreed on a law to use windfall profits generated from Russian central bank assets frozen in the bloc for Ukraine's defence, two sources familiar with the matter have told the Reuters news agency. 

In March, the EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, proposed taking 90% of revenues from Russian assets frozen in Europe and transfer them to an EU-run fund that finances weapons for Ukraine. 

Some 70% of all Russian assets immobilised in the West are held in the central securities depository Euroclear in Belgium, which has the equivalent of £163bn worth of Russian central bank securities and cash.

Explained: Why is the UK expelling a Russian attache?

A short time ago, we reported on a Home Office statement outlining the expulsion of a Russian defence attache - who the Home Secretary said was "an undeclared military intelligence officer". 

But why now? 

In the last few weeks, rhetoric has been building in Westminster about continued Russian interference in the UK and Europe.

This was partly down to the arrest of a British man charged over an arson plot on London businesses linked to Ukraine. 

The 20-year-old man is accused of masterminding alleged hostile state activity to benefit Moscow, in part by recruiting others for the arson attack. 

"The UK remains deeply concerned by allegations of Russian orchestrated malign activity on UK soil," a spokesperson for the Foreign Office said in the aftermath. 

"We call for an immediate cessation of this activity and we will continue to work with our allies to deter and defend against the full spectrum of threats that emanate from Russia."

Dylan Earl is alleged to have engaged in conduct targeting the businesses in order to benefit the Russian state.

Since then, it appears that both the Home and Foreign Offices have been looking into how to respond to what they consistently describe as "malign" activities. 

One such measure was to expel somebody the government believes may be spying for the Kremlin - another is to remove diplomatic premises status for certain buildings owned by the Russian state on British soil.  

One property, Seacox Heath, is a Russian owned-property in Sussex and officially is used as a weekend retreat for its embassy staff in the UK. 

Having diplomatic premises status means nobody can enter, including law enforcement, without the expressed permission of the (in this case) Russian ambassador of the head of diplomatic mission. 

Estonia's foreign ministry summons head of Russian embassy

Estonia's foreign ministry has summoned the head of the Russian embassy in Tallinn to protest the jamming of GPS signals, a minister in the Baltic country has said.

"Today we summoned Russian charge d'affaires over GPS jamming which is a violation of regulations of the International Telecommunication Union & has caused serious damage to Estonian air traffic," Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said on X

It follows Estonia's accusations last month that Russia had violated international airspace regulations by interfering with GPS signals after signal jamming forced it to make changes to its Tartu airport.

Russia and Estonia last year expelled each other's ambassadors as relations deteriorated in the wake of Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Putin inauguration: The famous faces spotted at Kremlin palace

Vladimir Putin began his fifth term as Russian president at a palace in Moscow in front of a crowd of faces - including actor Steven Seagal and the leader of a biker gang.

"We are a united and great people and together we will overcome all obstacles, realise all our plans, together we will win," he said after being sworn in on Tuesday.

At the ceremony in the gilded Grand Kremlin Palace, Mr Putin placed his hand on the Russian Constitutionand vowed to defend it, as a crowd of hand-picked dignitaries looked on. 

A number of famous faces were in the crowd waiting to see the Kremlin leader sworn in once again.

Find out who they were here