Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation

Benefits system ‘a cruel bureaucracy’, says Ken Loach after Cannes win

This article is more than 7 years old

Fresh from winning Palme d’Or with I, Daniel Blake, director says he hopes it will affect government policy in the same way as earlier film Cathy Come Home

Film-maker Ken Loach has called the benefits system a “cruel bureaucracy” that makes users feel inferior and desperate in an interview after winning his second Palme d’Or at the Cannes film festival.

Loach clinched the festival’s highest honour for his welfare state drama I, Daniel Blake, about a carpenter struggling with the inanities and indignities of the benefits system.

Loach, who will turn 80 next month, came out of retirement to make the movie, saying he hoped it would influence welfare policy in the same way one of his very first films, Cathy Come Home, had changed political thinking on homelessness.

“I think we have to look again at this whole cruel sanctions and benefit system, which is out to tell the poor that it’s their own fault and if they don’t have a job it’s because they are incompetent or useless,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday.

“There’s a despair and anger with people who are facing this and those trying to support them. The fact that we now accept food banks as part of our national scene, this is actually unacceptable.”

When asked by presenter Sarah Montague why he thought there was such a groundswell of public support for welfare measures such as the benefits cap, Loach said that was an opinion of “people who listen to the Today programme too much”.

“If you actually get out amongst the food banks and the people supporting people there, people who would not eat unless if it weren’t for the charity, who have to choose between heating and food, I think you’ll find there’s a great disgust and despair about that in this country now,” he said.

Despite being a realist drama about the British welfare system, I, Daniel Blake was praised by the Cannes jury for its universally relatable story, with jury member Donald Sutherland calling it “an absolutely terrific movie that resonates in your heart and soul”.

“I think dealing with a cruel bureaucracy is something that crosses borders and people understand the frustration of being constantly trapped by call centres, by people who won’t give you the help you need and facing a bureaucracy that is out to deny you what you feel is your right, is something we all understand,” Loach said.

The recognition for the film, he said, was down to “finding a theme and a story that people can identify with and take something from and has some connection to the world that we’re living in”.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Finnish basic income pilot improved wellbeing, study finds

  • Hull asks to be first UK city to trial universal basic income

  • Daniel Susskind: ‘Automation of jobs is one of the greatest questions of our time’

  • Sheffield council backs universal basic income trial

  • Universal basic income 'would cost less than value of benefit cuts since 2010'

  • Labour would trial universal basic income if elected, John McDonnell says

  • Labour-backed report urges trials of universal basic income

  • Benefit or burden? The cities trying out universal basic income

  • Universal basic income hasn’t made me rich. But my life is more enriching

Most viewed

Most viewed