Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Bowe Bergdahl prepares to be interviewed by army investigators last year.
Bowe Bergdahl prepares to be interviewed by army investigators last year. Photograph: Eugene R Fidell/AP
Bowe Bergdahl prepares to be interviewed by army investigators last year. Photograph: Eugene R Fidell/AP

Bowe Bergdahl: military officer recommends no prison time for soldier

This article is more than 8 years old

Army sergeant who was tortured by Taliban captors is accused of deserting Afghanistan post in 2009 before being released in 2014

The military officer who headed a hearing in the case of accused deserter army sergeant Bowe Bergdahl recommended that the man held captive by the Taliban in Afghanistan should not be sent to a military prison, Bergdahl’s lawyers said.

In a memorandum issued on Friday, lieutenant colonel Mark Visger, the presiding officer at the so-called Article 32 hearing last month in San Antonio, recommended “non-judicial punishment” for Bergdahl, the lawyers said.

Military officials were not immediately available for comment.

Bergdahl disappeared on 30 June 2009, from Combat Outpost Mest-Lalak in Paktika province, Afghanistan. He was captured by the Taliban, and suffered years of abuse and torture.

He was freed five years later in a prisoner swap that sent five Taliban leaders who were being held at Guantánamo Bay to Qatar.

During the two-day hearing in September, military prosecutors said Bergdahl had intended to desert his post. They said his actions fundamentally altered American operations in Afghanistan and called for him to be held accountable.

Bergdahl, 29, was charged earlier this year with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. He faces life in prison if convicted of the more serious offense of misbehavior.

Visger’s recommendations of a punishment under Article 15, without a punitive discharge, have not been publicly released, lawyers for Bergdahl said.

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 15 punishments include reduction of one grade in rank or a requirement that the soldier perform additional duties.

Visger will recommend the course of action for resolving Bergdahl’s case, such as whether it should proceed to a court-martial or be handled in some other manner. The final decision will be made by the commanding general of the US army forces command at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Major General Kenneth Dahl, who led the military’s investigation into Bergdahl’s disappearance and capture, told last month’s hearing Bergdahl should not be imprisoned, saying he was not a Taliban sympathizer.

Dahl characterized Bergdahl as an unrealistically idealistic soldier who left his post to report concerns about his unit’s leadership to a general at another base. He added that none of the soldiers sent to look for Bergdahl were killed.

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed