The Rise of Nayib Bukele, El Salvador’s Authoritarian President

The budding strongman has ridden Bitcoin schemes and a repressive crackdown on gangs to become Latin America’s most popular leader.
A woman hugs her boyfriend before police officers take him into the provisional detention center El Penalito in San...
Outside El Penalito, the little jail. El Salvador has long been ravaged by gang violence. In recent months, Bukele’s government has declared a state of emergency and detained some fifty thousand people.Photographs by Fred Ramos for The New Yorker

El Penalito, the little jail, is a squat concrete structure on a busy commercial street in San Salvador, the capital of El Salvador. On the morning of April 7th, a Thursday, fifty women were lined up along its front wall, wearing surgical masks and holding umbrellas against the sun. They’d been gathering there all week. It was nine-thirty, and about ninety degrees. Most of the women had been waiting since eight to reach a small window where a police official shared information on the whereabouts of their sons and husbands.

Toward the back of the line, wearing a long denim skirt and a red T-shirt, was a middle-aged woman with dark, lined skin and deep-set eyes. Her name was Yanira, and her son, she said, was a twenty-year-old with autism. He’d been arrested three days earlier, at home, where the two had been working throughout the pandemic, cleaning and reselling discarded plastic sleeves that hold bottles of hand sanitizer. Yanira rarely leaves him alone, but she had to run an errand. When she returned, thirty minutes later, the police had taken him away. “Sometimes he’ll wander into the street without his shoes,” she told me. “All the neighbors know him. But someone who doesn’t might think he’s a criminal, or crazy.”

A week before, members of El Salvador’s largest gang, MS-13, had murdered eighty-seven people in three days. The country has long been ravaged by gang violence, but these killings were unusual in their ruthlessness. People with no ties to crime were targeted: a fruit seller, a surf instructor, a homemaker, a cobbler. The gangsters went after everybody, but their message was directed at one person—the country’s President, Nayib Bukele, who has promised to radically reduce crime and to change El Salvador’s image abroad. Gang members left a corpse on the road leading to Surf City, a stretch of beachfront real estate on the Pacific Coast which Bukele had refurbished and renamed to attract international tourists.

In recent decades, every Salvadoran President has contended with the gangs. One administration sent soldiers to poor neighborhoods and filled the country’s prisons, under a policy it called mano dura, or “strong hand”; another reprised it as super mano dura. When Bukele was the mayor of San Salvador, he called these responses “immoral” and “impractical.” But now he declared war. Just after midnight on the second day of the homicide spike, the National Assembly, which Bukele’s party controls, instituted a “state of exception,” under which authorities could arrest anyone they considered suspicious. Detainees were not entitled to a legal defense. The right to gather in groups larger than two was suspended, and all minors would be tried as adults. On his Twitter account, Bukele, who is forty-one years old and has an approval rating of more than eighty per cent, shared a running tally of the arrests that followed, along with scabrous commentary, posting photographs of tattooed men in handcuffs and underwear (“little angels”), some of whom appeared to have been roughed up (“He must have been eating fries with ketchup”). Critics of the new policy—whether common citizens, journalists, or foreign governments—supported “the terrorists,” he wrote.

Yanira’s son was one of six thousand people arrested in the first week. By the time I met her, the total had risen to about nine thousand. A month and a half later, it would reach thirty thousand. Bukele conceded that one per cent of the roundups might result in wrongful arrests, but the public could only take his word for that figure. “As we continue arresting more gangsters, more people are going to protest,” Bukele said. “Because there will always be a mother of a gangster, a family member, or a friend who isn’t going to like that we are cleansing that cancer.”

Yanira was joined in the line by her daughter, who’d been missing work at a clothing shop to help locate her brother. The previous day, the daughter told me, they’d spent six hours visiting courthouses, searching for him. “We’re not the kind of people who have any experience in these sorts of places,” she said. She crossed the street while Yanira held their place in line. A bodega in front of El Penalito offers food and hygiene packages for detainees, ranging from a single meal ($2.50) to basic toiletries ($7.00) or a change of underwear ($15.50). (Prisoners without this assistance eat only intermittently.) Yanira’s daughter returned just in time to press a receipt for three meals into her mother’s hand before they reached the window. Farther down the block, a group of soldiers armed with rifles had stopped a public bus and were ordering the male passengers to step out and lift up their shirts. They were checking for tattoos that might indicate gang membership.

“I’ve been extra nice to people—I should be getting some thank-you notes.”
Cartoon by Frank Cotham

As the official at the window examined her son’s records, Yanira stood ramrod straight. Suddenly, she recoiled; when she turned away from the window, her eyes were wide. “Izalco” was all she could say, and she staggered off, sobbing. It was the name of a maximum-security prison that houses hardened gangsters. Her son had been sent there earlier that morning.

While the women waited outside El Penalito, another crowd was gathering, at the Miami Beach Convention Center. It consisted of investors and tech entrepreneurs, who were there to see Bukele, a keynote speaker at an annual Bitcoin conference. Last summer, he announced that El Salvador would be the first country in the world to accept bitcoin as legal tender. Within a few months, there were some two hundred special A.T.M.s set up across the country, and the government had launched an app, called the Chivo Wallet, on which each Salvadoran was given thirty dollars’ worth of bitcoin. At the conference, Bitcoiners, techno-utopians, and libertarians assembled to hear about a series of ambitious projects that Bukele had been promising ever since. They would have to wait a little longer. The conference, Bukele wrote in an apologetic note, was “one of the biggest celebrations of the power of freedom, decentralization, and human ingenuity in its fight against ignorance, centralization, and dogma.” But, owing to the state of exception, he needed to stay put. “Everything happens for a reason,” he went on. “Hopefully we’ll be able to learn soon why this had to happen this way.”

When Bukele was elected President, in 2019, he was the youngest head of state in Latin America and embodied a new national beginning. At his inauguration, his heavily pregnant wife stood beside him as he instructed crowds of ecstatic voters to raise a hand along with him after he swore the oath of office. Three of his recent predecessors had been either arrested or indicted, and all of them came from El Salvador’s two main political parties, which had governed without interruption for more than two decades. It had been a period of chronic poverty, violence, and mass emigration. “If you left to live in the United States and returned twenty years later, you’d find the same politicians,” Amparo Marroquín, a professor at the Central American University, in San Salvador, told me. “They were dinosaurs.” Bukele, who’d defected from one of the main parties, pitched himself as an anti-corruption reformer. His campaign slogan—“There’s enough money to go around as long as no one steals”—is a line that he has used for almost as long as he’s been in public life. He began his career at the age of thirty, as the mayor of a town of fewer than ten thousand people. After a single term, he ran for mayor of San Salvador. Fresh off that job, at thirty-seven, he was elected President.

Bukele, who wears leather jackets and backward baseball caps and has a beard, invokes Alexander the Great and Steve Jobs, and his brand is meant to be a bit of both: a potentate with an anti-establishment streak. At the United Nations General Assembly in 2019, he took a selfie from the dais, mid-address, reminding the world leaders in attendance that a “couple of images on Instagram can have a greater impact than any speech in this assembly.” Social media, he once said, “has shown us what people really are.” Before, “everybody was pretending.”

During the years of his ascent, the public heard from him constantly—on Twitter and Facebook, and in a continual procession of ribbon cuttings and other public appearances. As the mayor of San Salvador, he cleaned up parts of the city’s ramshackle downtown; renovated a trio of historic plazas; opened a high-end market, which has escalators and rooftop restaurants, in addition to a library equipped with computers and play areas for children. At one point, he unveiled a twenty-four-million-dollar public-works project, called 100% Iluminado, to install lamps on every street corner. “You can call it PR if you want to be a little cynical. But I’m talking about inspiration,” he told the Virginia Quarterly Review, in 2016. “I’m talking about something sublime.”

Usually, public adoration dims as the realities of governing set in, but Bukele’s support has grown. He is now the most popular leader in Latin America. In part, this is the result of his war on the gangs, his handling of the pandemic, public-infrastructure projects, an increase in the minimum wage, and low gas prices. It is also the product of a mammoth propaganda campaign. But, more profoundly, Bukele has succeeded in generating a palpable sense of collective expectancy and pride: the country is finally getting its act together.

The United States, the European Union, and the Organization of American States have criticized Bukele’s most audacious acts as President. These include threatening members of Congress with troops, and firing Supreme Court magistrates and replacing them with judges who have allowed Bukele to run for a second term despite a constitutional ban. But the foreign criticism has enabled Bukele to unify Salvadorans against a common enemy, and has put him, and his country of six and a half million people, on the map. “Why are they so concerned about a country so small?” he has said. In 2021, Time included Bukele in its list of the world’s most influential people, alongside Narendra Modi, Donald Trump, and Naftali Bennett. “Ok boomers,” he recently tweeted, in English, at members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “You have 0 jurisdiction on a sovereign and independent nation. We are not your colony.”

For much of his career, Bukele has basked in the limelight of the press: visits to Washington, to address the Americas Society and the Heritage Foundation, interviews with Jorge Ramos and Ben Smith. When the coverage turned critical, however, he stopped engaging with international journalists. I was no exception. As one of his advisers put it, “Why talk to you when he can speak directly to the people?”

Bukele may represent the future, but he talks a lot about the past—the politicians who robbed public coffers, the gangs that sowed terror, the institutions that never worked. “It’s a kind of revanchism,” Juan Antonio Durán, a judge, told me. He was demoted last year, after criticizing the President for forcing a third of the federal judiciary into early retirement. By then, at least fifty government officials and high-profile critics had had to leave the country, according to Revista Factum, a Salvadoran news magazine. Bukele, after many accusations that he was concentrating power, changed his Twitter bio to “the coolest dictator in the world.” A member of his party identified himself on social media as “Minister of Trolls.” Bukele’s voters expected him to have enemies, a member of Congress told me. “What the President is selling the people is revenge.”

All through the nineteen-eighties, El Salvador was a place of obsessive U.S. interest. Ronald Reagan said that it was “on the front line of the battle that is really aimed at the very heart of the Western Hemisphere, and eventually at us.” When fighting broke out between the country’s right-wing government and leftist guerrillas, the U.S. sided with the government; it armed the military, trained and advised its officer corps, and covered up their worst abuses. For twelve years, the guerrillas fought the U.S.-backed government to a stalemate, and some seventy-five thousand civilians died. Eighty-five per cent of the killings were committed by the military and the security forces, which massacred large numbers of the rural poor for sympathizing with the guerrillas. Bukele was ten when peace accords were signed, in 1992. Nearly a quarter of the Salvadoran population ended up moving to the United States.

“What the President is selling people is revenge,” a member of Congress said. His voters expect him to have enemies.

Bukele grew up in San Salvador, as a privileged outsider. His father was a Muslim businessman of Palestinian descent, who opened the country’s first McDonald’s franchise, ran a textile company, helped build four mosques, and owned a public-relations firm. He was also a polygamist with six wives. Bukele, who has three brothers and seven half siblings, went to a bilingual private school. Most of his well-heeled classmates shared their families’ conservative outlooks. But Bukele’s father was a man of the left and a supporter of the guerrilla forces, called the Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional, or the F.M.L.N., which became one of the two major political parties after the war. Muslim leftists stood out in Salvadoran high society. In the late nineties, after Al Qaeda gained international notoriety, the Bukele family was stopped by customs agents at the airport because of their suspicious-sounding name, according to a deep investigative profile by the journalist Gabriel Labrador. If the incident rattled Bukele, he refused to let on. Popular enough to be elected president of his high-school class, he captioned his yearbook photograph “Class terrorist.”

Bukele’s political apprenticeship began after he dropped out of college and was managing a night club in downtown San Salvador. He took over his family’s public-relations firm, whose key client was the F.M.L.N. The Presidency and the Assembly were controlled by the Alianza Republicana Nacionalista, or ARENA, which was founded, in the early eighties, by a member of a right-wing death squad. The Party catered primarily to the business élite, but its members included ex-military men and religious conservatives. An accumulation of corruption scandals sank ARENA, in 2009, allowing the F.M.L.N. to gain power, which it held on to for the next decade. In 2011, Bukele launched a self-funded bid for mayor of Nuevo Cuscatlán, an old ARENA stronghold outside the capital. “Don’t get involved in politics,” his father had once warned him, according to an interview recovered by the investigative newspaper El Faro. “Politicians who lose are . . . thrown away. You’ll be damaged goods.”

But Bukele already had a plan: he would run on the F.M.L.N. ticket while downplaying his associations with the Party. “I did not live the war,” he said in a television interview during the campaign. “I’m of the postwar generation, a generation that has new ideas.” His politics were leftist—progressive taxes, increased public spending—but he avoided the F.M.L.N.’s hoary pronouncements about revolution. He also rejected the Party’s trademark colors of red and white, instead blanketing the streets with campaign materials that featured his name in white against a backdrop of light blue. “I have friends who are conservative, and they’d never vote for the F.M.L.N.,” he told one of his advisers.

Bukele won by less than two per cent, and governed as if he were still campaigning. He erected a large stone sign with a white “N” engraved in a circle at the entrance to Nuevo Cuscatlán. He also opened a twenty-four-hour medical clinic, a library, and a community center. Each month, seniors received a free basket of food. Bukele vowed to donate his entire salary to a new program funding grants for students to take classes in English and computer science. The town’s debt ballooned, but his popularity soon eclipsed that of the Party elders.

The F.M.L.N. encouraged him to run for mayor of San Salvador, a job widely seen as a stepping stone to the Presidency. “The leader of the Party told everyone that Nayib’s candidacy would get us two or three more seats in Congress,” a former Party official told me. “They all thought that it would help them.”

Bukele, who felt his power growing, shut the Party out of his campaign, relying instead on family members and old friends. One of them was Ernesto Castro, his chief secretary in Nuevo Cuscatlán, who now serves as the president of the National Assembly. Another was his younger brother Karim. In public, Nayib was polished and poised, but in private meetings he tended to be distracted and jittery. He checked his phone constantly, drank four Red Bulls a day, kept odd hours, and struggled to focus on individual tasks. A former associate told me, “If an idea occurs to him, and he thinks it’s brilliant, he does it. Then, afterward, if it’s illegal? Oops!” Karim would sit quietly before making calm, authoritative pronouncements. “It wasn’t a meeting unless Karim was there,” the former Party official said. Together, the brothers reprised the high points of the Nuevo Cuscatlán campaign—the same colors, the same insignia (“N”), and the same slogan (“New Ideas”). By the time Bukele won, he had developed a recognizable brand and had more Twitter followers than the country’s President did.

When journalists dug into Bukele’s accomplishments in office—the market downtown, the revitalization of San Salvador’s historic commercial district—they found evidence of irregularities. The mayor’s office had disregarded permits and zoning ordinances. It paid inflated prices to contractors, and kept information from the city council. One businessman who worked with Bukele at the time told me, “Before Bukele, you’d want to get something done, and when you’d go in to meet with the mayor you’d find a long table full of council members, lots of bureaucracy. With Bukele, you’d sit down at the same long table, but it would just be him with an assistant. On the one hand, it was great because it was just one guy. On the other, you’d leave thinking, Uh-oh, it’s just one guy.”

Bukele came to regard any investigation into his leadership as a personal attack. Edwin Segura, a pollster and a political columnist, told me, “Anytime the media put out something questioning his accomplishments, it was because they were against him.” Bukele started building an alternative media landscape: TV programs, a network of trolls on Twitter, an army of YouTubers, and several publications that posted pro-Bukele stories on Facebook.

Bukele’s portrayal of himself as a contrarian truth-teller was effective, but it was a falling out with the F.M.L.N. that turned him into a political juggernaut. In the fall of 2017, an argument broke out in a San Salvador city-council meeting over the issuance of a building permit for a revitalization project. According to reporting by Labrador, Bukele accused the council’s legal director, a lawyer with the F.M.L.N., of conspiring against him. At one point, she claimed, he threw an apple at her and said, “Take this apple, you witch!”

The incident led to a formal vote expelling Bukele from the Party, but the F.M.L.N. was divided. “The leaders were also scared that Bukele might resign,” the official told me. “He was so popular. He had this huge reach on social media. The breaking point was when he wanted to be President. They used the apple to cover it up.”

“Can you roll it back for nine more minutes?”
Cartoon by Drew Dernavich

Shortly afterward, Bukele, at a gathering in the U.S. with Salvadoran immigrants, said, “ARENA and the F.M.L.N. are really the same.” He announced the formation of a new party, Nuevas Ideas. In February, 2019, he was elected President with fifty-three per cent of the vote.

The arm—bare and handcuffed at the wrist, the hand in a fist—came into view on a two-lane road leading from the capital to San Vicente. It was jutting out from the back of a police pickup truck that was driving past a store called Tulita’s Classic Sweets. A man was lying in the bed of the truck, but all that was visible was his arm, chained to a rack attached to the cab.

One of the strangest aspects of the state of exception was how infrequent sightings like this were, unless you went looking for them. The government was broadcasting its harshest acts, and on Twitter there was a flood of photographs, videos, and menacing announcements. But on the main streets of the country’s biggest cities nothing seemed out of the ordinary. “The state of exception is directed at the poor, marginalized areas,” Rina Montti, the director of investigations at Cristosal, a human-rights group, told me. “These are stigmatized communities with people who are seen as having dudosa confiabilidad ”—“questionable trustworthiness.” She continued, “You hear people say, ‘Surely they must have done something if they’re being taken away.’ ”

On a Saturday night, an old Salvadoran friend of mine proposed that we shoot pool at a billiard hall in San Salvador’s historic downtown. He is a father of three in his mid-forties who runs a small business in the capital. The last time I’d seen him—about six years earlier, at the start of Bukele’s mayoral term—he made trips downtown only during daylight hours, because it was too dangerous after dark. He was encouraged by the President’s actions during the state of exception, as is more than ninety per cent of the population, according to recent polls. “Nayib is fighting,” he said. “Of course he has his critics. He’s doing new things, radical things. It’s all on the up and up. People are always trying to be so down on El Salvador. But I don’t hear Salvadorans talking about leaving, like before.” At the pool hall, it was Eighties Night, and a d.j. played the Sugar Hill Gang and Run-DMC while people danced and ate tapas. We left after midnight. As we strolled through the illuminated downtown plazas, he snapped photos of the Art Nouveau National Theatre.

In the zonas marginalizadas, where the gangs had been in control, however, residents were effectively trapped between them and the government. I arrived in Distrito Italia, a community of ten thousand people about an hour north of San Salvador, on a Monday evening, to find a cordon of some twenty soldiers in combat fatigues and armed with semi-automatic rifles. They had set up a checkpoint for anyone entering or leaving the residential area. Soldiers searched bags and checked I.D. cards, and as people returned from work the line grew long. The commanding officer sought me out as soon as I arrived. “If you haven’t done anything wrong, you’ll be fine,” he said. “People outside El Salvador probably don’t understand.”

A few minutes later, I noticed a woman in a green striped shirt, with dark, frizzy hair, standing at a slight remove from the crowd. Her two sons—ages eighteen and twenty-one—were returning from work, and she was waiting to meet them, so that they could all walk home together. Mostly, she felt alivio—“relief”—she said: “There are soldiers inside patrolling.” When I asked her whether she worried that her sons might get arrested, she shrugged. “Until it happens to you, it doesn’t matter what happens to someone else,” Verónica Reyna, a security expert who works at a nonprofit called Servicio Social Pasionista, told me. “It’s a survival instinct. The more violence people live with, the less they can care about other people. Getting involved in other people’s lives is deadly.”

Gangs have dominated life in El Salvador since the late nineties, but they didn’t originate there. MS-13 and Barrio 18 both began in Los Angeles, at least a decade earlier, as hundreds of thousands of Salvadorans fled the civil war. Many of the teen-agers, adrift when they arrived, turned to crime in the inner city, where Mexican and Black gangs enforced a brutal racial hierarchy. After thousands of Salvadoran youths were arrested, the Clinton Administration saw an opportunity to demonstrate its toughness both on immigration and on crime. It deported violent offenders without telling the Salvadoran government who they were. “The United States lets these dangerous types out and tells them, ‘Go back to where you came from,’ ” the President of El Salvador said in 1997. “But we have no way to try them or jail them . . . and so we must not only let them in but let them go free.”

Cliques from Southern California arrived in El Salvador, bringing their rivalries and their turf wars with them. “They consumed everything in their path,” the anthropologist Juan José Martínez d’Aubuisson has written. “Piecemeal neighborhood gangs saw no choice but to join one of the two for their own survival. The alternative was complete annihilation.” By 2015, there were some sixty thousand gang members in El Salvador, and seventy per cent of the country’s businesses were being extorted, leading to annual losses of four billion dollars, according to estimates by the Salvadoran Central Reserve Bank. The homicide rate was higher than it had been during much of the civil war.

A series of Salvadoran administrations launched dramatic crackdowns that played well with the public but failed to curb the violence. In 2012, David Munguía Payés, who had served as a general during the war and was now the Minister of Security in an F.M.L.N. government, decided that the gangs, like the guerrillas, couldn’t be beaten with force alone. He brought in a former guerrilla, a Catholic bishop, and a representative from the Organization of American States to negotiate with them. A deal was reached, and the homicide rate dropped for almost eighteen months, but revelations of the talks incited public outrage. The next President, who also came from the F.M.L.N., renounced the deal, and the government negotiators were eventually prosecuted for their involvement. In 2020, Munguía Payés was arrested for “unlawful association.” Other members of the F.M.L.N. and ARENA have faced jail time for making ad-hoc deals with the gangs, either to enforce higher turnout at election time or to periodically blunt the death count.

As the mayor of San Salvador, Bukele made an agreement with members of Barrio 18, who controlled the area around the Mercado Cuscatlán, according to El Faro. The government gave them space among the venders’ stalls, and, in return, the gang allowed the market to operate. Bukele has denied this, and as President he adopted visible measures to combat the gangs. He called his policy the Territorial Control Plan; it increased the police presence in some municipalities and declared a state of emergency inside the national prisons, which had the immediate effect of mixing rival populations that had long been kept apart. At the start of the pandemic, the authorities arranged hundreds of bare-chested prisoners in their underwear, pressed tightly together in rows, for a photo opportunity. One of the President’s advisers told me, “Look how he’s treating the gangs. How could he be talking to them?”

“Man needlessly dressed in professional cycling outfit on your right.”
Cartoon by E. S. Glenn and Colin Nissan

But Bukele started negotiating with MS-13 as soon as he became President, according to another story in El Faro. During his first year in office, he didn’t have a majority in the Assembly, and for his fledgling party to win seats he needed the homicide rate to fall. “The big drops in homicides were never just the work of the government,” Verónica Reyna told me. “Bukele learned the lesson from what happened before. He closed ranks. No one had access to the prisons for a year and a half.”

The El Faro story relied on hundreds of pages of prison documents, in addition to logbooks from facilities where secret meetings were held between gang leadership and government representatives. In an intercepted message, one leader of MS-13 told another, “Things are going step by step.” The government, he said, was increasing enforcement to keep up appearances, so that the negotiations could continue. “These measures are just a coverup,” he went on. “They’re looking out for the well-being of us homies.”

Less than a week after the story was published, Bukele announced that the government would investigate El Faro for money laundering. Since then, he has attacked the newspaper relentlessly, sometimes calling out journalists by name. A few of them have been forced into exile; many others have adopted the practice of leaving the country after publishing a story and waiting to return until the threats have died down. The newspaper has a large international following, but inside El Salvador Bukele’s campaign against it has succeeded. Many people have come to see El Faro as partisan and unreliable.

The night before I arrived in El Salvador, the National Assembly passed a sweeping law to block news outlets from reporting on the gang situation. Journalists could now face up to ten years in prison if they “reproduced” or “transmitted” information that might have come from gang sources or could otherwise “panic” the public. The law was ambiguous by design, César Fagoaga, then the president of the Association of Journalists of El Salvador, told me. “This isn’t a legal problem—it’s a political problem,” he said. “They want to control the only thing they don’t have—journalism.” Claudia Ortiz, a first-term congresswoman from a fledgling party called Vamos, told me, “The real opposition right now that’s doing substantive things is outside the Assembly. It’s investigative journalism, the universities, social organizations exposing real problems.”

In the nine days that I spent in El Salvador in April, three more journalists had to leave the country after being falsely accused by the President and members of his party of conspiring with the gangs. One of them—a reporter named Bryan Avelar, who works with the New York Times—was the target of a viral campaign that claimed his brother was a prominent gangster. (He doesn’t have any brothers.) “They know that they can have us arrested if they feel like it,” Julia Gavarrete, a reporter with El Faro, told me. Last year, she was one of thirty-five journalists and human-rights advocates to discover that their cell phones had been infected with the surveillance software Pegasus.

The government could deny press reports, but certain facts remained. Last year, Bukele refused a U.S. request to extradite fourteen top-ranking members of MS-13. The Salvadoran government secretly released some of the men from prison, and they are now at large. According to a joint investigation by La Prensa Gráfica and InSight Crime, one of the gangsters, whose nom de guerre is Crook of Hollywood, walked out of the country’s most secure prison during a crime wave last November. The following month, homicides decreased.

Recently, the journalist Carlos Martínez published a story in El Faro based on seven audio recordings of conversations between members of MS-13 and a government negotiator close to Bukele. The code name they use for the President is Batman. There are explicit references to two years of secret talks, and the official takes pains to describe everything he’s done for the gang to prove his “loyalty and trustworthiness.” What caused the killing spree in March, according to three gang members cited in the story, was the arrest of a group of gangsters who were travelling in a government vehicle. They felt betrayed because they’d been promised “safe passage.”

Uncharacteristically, the government did not attack the article when it came out. In June, 2022, Patrick Ventrell, the American Chargé d’Affaires, gave a press conference in San Salvador at which he said, “The best way for the government of El Salvador to show that it is serious” about fighting the gangs “is to extradite the most dangerous leaders.” Later in the summer, Bukele extradited two of them with little fanfare. This news was eclipsed by the construction of a prison to hold more suspected gang members, which he was calling the Terrorism Confinement Center.

It’s taken as an article of faith that the public cares about such abstract principles as the rule of law and the health of public institutions. But voters also want to see their man win, because it means that they’re winning. Often, authoritarian tactics play better than high-minded poise does. On February 9, 2020, eight months into Bukele’s term, a crowd of a few thousand demonstrators gathered outside the National Assembly, which was not in session. They’d arrived in government vehicles and in buses driven by soldiers, and were there to protest the refusal by members of the Assembly to fund a key plank of Bukele’s security budget. Shortly after 4 p.m., a caravan of S.U.V.s pulled up, and Bukele emerged. Surrounded by bodyguards, he strode to a stage set up at the end of an alley leading to the chamber, and the crowd roared. “Wait here,” he told them, then headed inside. Armed soldiers in combat fatigues followed him.

While the troops fanned out across the gallery, Bukele called a symbolic session to order. “I think it’s clear who’s in control of the situation,” he said into a microphone. He put it down and bowed his head in prayer. After a few seconds, he rose and returned to the crowd outside. This time, when he approached the stage, half a dozen soldiers stood beside him, their rifles drawn.

A funeral procession for Germán Orlando Escobar, a detainee who died in prison.

“I asked God, and he told me, ‘Patience,’ ” Bukele said. He’s never made clear which religion he practices, yet he frequently invokes God, projecting a firm but flexible piety. (“It’s one of his key characteristics,” Marroquín, of the Central American University, told me. “He can seem Catholic or Protestant, Christian, or even Muslim.”) Bukele’s religious rhetoric generally sways the public, but this crowd was expecting something more dramatic. People started to groan. “Patience, patience,” he repeated. “These sinvergüenzas,” he continued, gesturing behind him in reference to the obstructionist congressmen. “We’ll get rid of them democratically. . . . In several months, we’re going to have the Assembly.”

In Central America, the symbolism was lost on nobody: a head of state had just breached another branch of the government with troops. “The whole thing got out of hand,” a former government official told me. But those people who thought Bukele would suffer consequences were mistaken. “The most significant thing wasn’t what happened but what didn’t,” Johnny Wright, a congressman with the party Nuestro Tiempo, told me. “That was the moment when he knew, he tested that he would not have resistance.”

Hours after the incursion, Bukele received a text message from his former attorney Bertha Deleón. “You’ve gone too far,” she wrote. When he didn’t reply, she decided to tweet. His response was swift. “Delete this,” he told her. “You’re attacking us.” Deleón refused, and the government launched a smear campaign against her. She was a trending topic on Twitter for days, accused of protecting the gangs and of abetting criminals. People shouted at her on the street. “I worked for the prosecutor’s office for years on organized crime,” she said. “Old colleagues came up to me saying, ‘Now we’re supposed to be investigating you. Fix this, or leave.’ ” Months later, with multiple corruption charges lodged against her and an Interpol warrant out for her arrest, she told me the story from Mexico, where she had recently been granted asylum.

Bukele’s most conspicuous enabler during this period was the Trump Administration. The American Ambassador to El Salvador was a former mid-level C.I.A. staffer named Ronald Johnson, whose relationship with Bukele was characterized by friendly informality. All Trump cared about, a former Administration official told me, was immigration, and Bukele acted accordingly. In 2019, he was so eager to comply with a deal on asylum processing that his advisers e-mailed a signed copy of the agreement straight to the Department of Homeland Security. U.S. officials had to call them back to explain that the protocol was more involved. In return, Bukele “really wanted the State Department to lower the threat level for travel to El Salvador,” the former Administration official told me. “That was a really big thing to him. He was promoting Surf City.” (Eventually, the U.S. reduced the threat level, which officials claimed to have been reviewing before Bukele pushed for the change in status.)

A few weeks after Bukele’s stunt at the National Assembly, the first case of Covid-19 was detected in El Salvador. On March 21st, Bukele declared a state of exception, issuing strict guidelines for a national quarantine. Those people who violated its terms were arrested and sent to “containment centers.” In theory, the centers were reserved for Salvadorans who’d been travelling abroad and needed to be tested. But they soon became de-facto jails, where returning travellers and anyone accused of ignoring the rules were held indefinitely, in many cases for longer than a month. Ten thousand people were detained in the early months of the pandemic.

The Supreme Court twice declared Bukele’s measures unconstitutional, but he ignored the rulings and accused the judges of threatening public health. “If I really were a dictator, I would shoot all of them,” Bukele said. “You save thousands of lives in exchange for five.” He publicly commanded the police and the military to make more arrests, in contravention of the judges’ orders. “The inflection point was the pandemic,” the former government official told me. “That’s when Bukele really started taking advantage.”

The public was too overwhelmed with its own survival to worry about the finer points of governance, and El Salvador’s infection rate stayed low compared with those of neighboring countries. In June, a gleaming new hospital for Covid patients went up, billed as the biggest such facility in Latin America. (It remains unfinished.) The military distributed food to poor areas, and Bukele gave three hundred dollars in cash relief to more than a third of the country. “The people are seeing that he is working hard and doing things for the public,” a thirty-three-year-old named Gisele de Hernández, who worked in a tortilla shop, told the Spanish newspaper El País. Another person said, “Bukele isn’t dividing El Salvador. The country is already divided.”

The following February, when El Salvador held legislative elections, Nuevas Ideas won fifty-six of the eighty-four seats—a super-majority. The new members of the Assembly were a mixture of true believers and opportunists, but all were united in their loyalty to the person who had brought them to power. “Bukele is the Party,” a senior U.S. official told me.

The new legislators went after their first target on the day of their swearing in. They arrived at nine in the morning, and the session ran past midnight. “We entered without knowing anything,” Claudia Ortiz, of Vamos, told me. The Supreme Court magistrates who had opposed Bukele’s pandemic measures were summarily fired, for acting against the best interests of the public. The Nuevas Ideas bloc also fired the Attorney General, whose term was up at the end of the year. The President’s personal lawyer told an opposition lawmaker in private, “We have to be disruptive. People voted for us for a reason. They wanted us to change things radically. We’re going to change this place for good.” Four days later, the Assembly approved a law blocking all investigations into the government’s pandemic spending and shielding officials from corruption charges.

Bukele had assumed office saying that his relationship with the U.S. was “the No. 1 priority for us.” But the U.S. had a new President, and both countries had changed. “When we tried to normalize the relationship, he felt like we were pulling the rug out from under him,” the senior U.S. official told me. “We didn’t have the red carpets out, so he thought it was a deliberate attempt to embarrass him.” The Biden Administration began drawing up a list of sanctions against members of Bukele’s administration, for actions including corruption and conspiracy with the gangs. Bukele continued to meet Johnson, the previous Ambassador, in Miami, and he retained another American adviser, who shared the view that the Democrats wouldn’t control the White House for long. When Bukele decided to give a big interview in the winter of 2021, it wasn’t to the Salvadoran news media or to CNN but to Tucker Carlson. “He’s trying to ride the culture war,” the senior U.S. official told me. “But El Salvador does not have the luxury of deciding that one party is going to protect its interests forevermore.”

A checkpoint outside Distrito Italia, which for years has had a large gang presence.

For the past three years, crypto evangelists from all over the world have made a pilgrimage to a rustic beach in El Salvador called El Zonte, where a middle-aged surfer from California named Mike Peterson launched an experimental charity. Its financing came from an anonymous philanthropist who imposed a single condition: the money had to be distributed entirely in bitcoin. Soon, mom-and-pop businesses, markets, and food stalls in the area were accepting the currency. El Zonte came to be known as Bitcoin Beach.

In the spring of 2021, Bitcoin Beach drew a minor crypto celebrity—Jack Mallers, a twenty-seven-year-old tech entrepreneur who was building an app called Strike. The service allows users to make money transfers, with no fees, on Lightning, a high-speed network that is linked to the technology behind Bitcoin. El Salvador fascinated Mallers for reasons that went beyond Bitcoin Beach. Twenty per cent of the country’s gross domestic product comes from remittances sent by Salvadorans living abroad, mostly in the U.S. But when immigrants use Western Union to transfer money they typically pay a hefty fee. “Lightning solves that,” Mallers has said. “It costs nothing to send one dollar or one thousand.” After living in Bitcoin Beach for a month, he started spending time in San Salvador. He was having a sushi dinner with friends one night when he noticed a direct message on Twitter. “Hi, Jack, this is a message on behalf of President Bukele,” it began. A few days later, Karim Bukele, wearing a hoodie, greeted Mallers and introduced him to his brother.

At the Bitcoin Conference in Miami that summer, Mallers presented Bukele, who addressed attendees by video, in fluent English. He announced that El Salvador would begin accepting bitcoin, and presented a heady case for how Bitcoin could solve some of El Salvador’s problems. Seventy per cent of Salvadorans don’t have bank accounts, but more than half of them use cell phones. “El Salvador has not been the country that’s recognized to be the first in innovation,” Bukele later told the podcaster Peter McCormack. “But why not this time?” Championing the currency has turned him into a global cult hero, a crusader against U.S. hegemony. “This is just exercising our sovereign right to adopt legal tenders, like we adopted the U.S. dollar in the year 2001,” he continued. “In 2001, it was probably done for the benefits of the banks, and this decision is done for the benefits of the people.”

Salvadorans found out about the Bitcoin policy from news reports after the Miami announcement. The following September, the Bukele administration presented its Bitcoin Law, which Mallers helped shape, and the National Assembly passed it without debate or modification.

Bitcoiners are skeptical of governments and central banks, but their goal is the universal adoption of the currency, and they need more countries to follow El Salvador’s lead. Even so, some of them were troubled by its example. The rush to create the Bitcoin Law resulted in confusing provisions: one article mandates that all merchants accept bitcoin, but another seems to hedge on that requirement. “The government operated on a startup’s timeline—move fast and break things,” Jill Gunter, the chief strategy officer at Espresso Systems, a blockchain company, told me. “But you’re talking about an actual sovereign nation, with the well-being of millions of people at stake.”

There were some red flags. Bitcoin users need both a public key and a private one to access their money, and many people rely on a “digital wallet” to store these keys. The government created its own—the Chivo Wallet app—but shared virtually no information about who was designing it or how it would work.

One afternoon, I was walking through the main plaza in Usulután, a small city in the country’s southeast, when I saw two soldiers standing guard outside a gleaming blue Chivo A.T.M. The unused machine looked like a monument, or a shrine. The businesses that accept bitcoin tend to be large international corporations (Pizza Hut, McDonald’s, Starbucks); a recent survey by the Chamber of Commerce found that eighty-six per cent of the country’s commercial businesses have never conducted a bitcoin transaction.

Last November, during Bitcoin Week in El Salvador, Bukele made another announcement, this one from a beachfront stage rigged with strobe lights and jets of smoke. The sky lit up with fireworks, and on a giant screen behind him, in neon-blue letters, were the words “El Presidente.” The aesthetic was somewhere between a Kiss concert and an I.P.O. “When Alexander the Great was conquering the world, he established ‘Alexandrias,’ ” Bukele said. “These Alexandrias would be like beacons of hope for the rest of the world. We should build the first Alexandria here, in El Salvador. So we were thinking of building”—a pause for effect—“Bitcoin City.”

Bitcoin City would be an actual municipality, powered by the geothermal energy of a nearby volcano and funded by a new financial instrument called Bitcoin Bonds, or Volcano Bonds, which will pay yields tied to the sale of bitcoin. The issuance of these bonds, according to Bukele, would raise a billion dollars. The rush of investment would help fund schools, hospitals, and public works—in theory, at least. The question was who would invest in the bonds, given that, by most accounts, their returns were no better than those of the alternatives. Matt Levine, a columnist at Bloomberg, wrote, “People who like crypto will buy them and trade them with each other and feel a sense of kinship and community and fun. They are HODLers and whales, they get to hang out with the president of a country on a Saturday night.”

In attendance at the announcement was an American investor and early Bitcoin adopter named Max Keiser, who runs a fund called El Zonte Capital. He’s part of a group of international financiers who are selling the image of a dynamic new El Salvador. When we spoke, Keiser had just dined with Bukele at the Presidential Palace. He had flown in with his wife for the occasion, on a plane belonging to “Uncle Ricky,” the Mexican businessman and TV magnate Ricardo Salinas Pliego, who is a passionate Bitcoiner and a pro-Bukele partisan. Keiser tends to see conspiracies in high places. He suggested to me that the U.S. State Department had been involved in the gang killings in March, but he praised Bukele’s state of exception as “phenomenal.” “Some suggest human rights have been violated. I would say that the human rights of seven million Salvadorans are what matters,” he said. “Imagine J.F.K. if he had Bitcoin to do battle with the C.I.A. and central banks—and what you get is President Bukele today. El Salvador is the new Camelot.”

El Zonte, which has come to be known as Bitcoin Beach.

Since El Salvador adopted bitcoin, the currency’s value has fluctuated wildly. But Bukele continued to buy more of it with state funds, including a hundred coins last November and five hundred more in early May, after the price dropped. “El Salvador just bought the dip!” he wrote on Twitter. The country now holds some twenty-four hundred bitcoins, worth approximately forty-eight million dollars, or roughly half what Bukele paid for them.

Short-term losses are hardly the biggest danger to the Salvadoran economy. The International Monetary Fund, from which El Salvador sought a $1.3-billion loan, considers bitcoin a threat both to the global financial system and to the country’s immediate solvency. In January, 2023, El Salvador will need to make one eight-hundred-million-dollar bond payment, followed by another, in 2025. “The financial markets now see El Salvador as much riskier than before,” the economist Ricardo Castaneda told me. “The reasons are failures of democratic institutions, the adoption of bitcoin, and the lack of certainty about plans for paying off the country’s debt.” The former government official told me, “Bitcoin investment is a cloud that doesn’t exist. The state reserves are the last resource for the government to pay for basic needs. Maybe it can get them to the 2024 elections.”

Nuevas Ideas shows no signs of losing its super-majority in Congress, yet its members live in fear of misspeaking. Late last year, two of the Party’s congressmen were recorded sharing concerns over the phone about losing their travel visas as a result of U.S. sanctions. Both have been forced from their jobs and are currently under investigation.

The only member of the Bukele government willing to speak with me was the Vice-President, Félix Ulloa, Jr. He received me one morning at his official residence, in an upscale neighborhood of San Salvador. He sat in a high-backed wood chair with blue velvet trim. On the wall was a surrealist painting of Lady Justice, blindfolded, with her body floating in three unconnected pieces among the clouds. Ulloa, a short man with long hair and a copper-colored beard, is a constitutional scholar with degrees from universities in three countries. He is thirty years older than the President he serves, and a veteran of left-wing causes.

“I have been a social warrior all my life, and I fought not just with words—we took up arms,” he told me. This was a reference to the war years, when he was a student radical. “We fought against a dictatorship. . . . Those who say this is a dictatorship don’t know what a dictatorship is.” He continued, “We spent the two years of the pandemic clashing with Congress.” It was “an assembly dominated by the two parties which blocked everything the President proposed.”

We spoke for an hour, during which he delivered a litany of economic-growth figures, improved homicide statistics, and news of prominent foreign investors who had visited the country. Tourism was up, and preparations were under way for an international surfing competition. But all topics led back to a fact that no one could refute: the President and his party had won their elections and continued to enjoy overwhelming public support. Until Bukele lost a vote or rigged an election, the rest was academic. At the end of the month, the state of exception was due to expire. Would the Assembly extend it? I asked. “During the war, we lived six years with a state of exception,” he replied. There was “nothing strange” about doing it again.

On a recent night, I was speaking with a woman named Karen, whose husband had been arrested during a work break at a taxi stand in a town near San Salvador. He and his employee were eating pupusas on the street, and, when a cook from the food stall walked over to collect their money, a group of officers converged on the three of them. The charge was “illegal gathering.” A jealous neighbor may have called in a tip—Karen’s husband had never been arrested, and he was a fixture at their local church. He had also enthusiastically voted for Bukele in 2019. Baffled, Karen tried everything, including speaking to local reporters to publicize the case, but nothing changed. When she first told me the story, we were hunched over a small table in the food court of a mall, her face teary.

We stayed in touch as the state of exception kept getting extended. It is still in effect, even though daily homicides have dropped. Each month, when the Assembly has to renew it, the Speaker convenes the body with an announcement on Twitter. Nuevas Ideas members reply enthusiastically, with emojis and updated profile pictures. Most of them retweet Bukele, who routinely announces days with zero homicides. “Seguimos,” he says, at the end of each one—“Onward.” Fifty thousand people have now been detained.

“There’s no official policy beyond giving people blanket sentences and keeping them detained,” Rina Montti, of Cristosal, told me. “We’ve been to hearings where there are between three hundred and five hundred people being tried en masse. But there’s no actual criminal investigation.” Cristosal has been documenting detention conditions based on individual complaints brought by family members of detainees. At least seventy people have died while in custody.

Karen has two small children, and she was now caring for them while working two jobs—her own and her husband’s. In the first weeks after his arrest, she found time every morning to visit Izalco, the prison where he was being held. It was a two-hour trip, and she made it to prove her vigilance, since the prison didn’t allow visitors. The crowds of women who’d once gathered outside small police precincts were now reassembling each day in front of Izalco and Mariona, the two prisons, both overcrowded, where nearly everyone had been sent.

The last time Karen and I spoke, she told me that she could no longer make the trips to see her husband. “Too much work,” she said. Her voice was dry, almost raspy with exhaustion. “Everyone is getting six months” in prison, she added. He was now more than halfway through, though his crime remained a mystery. ♦