Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Florida gay marriage
Alabama will become the 37th state where gay marriage is legal after Friday’s ruling by US district court judge Callie Granade. Photograph: J Pat Carter/AP
Alabama will become the 37th state where gay marriage is legal after Friday’s ruling by US district court judge Callie Granade. Photograph: J Pat Carter/AP

Federal judge strikes down Alabama gay marriage ban

This article is more than 9 years old
  • Couples could apply for marriage licenses as early as Saturday
  • Ban not justified to protect ties between children and parents, judge rules

Interactive: gay marriage in America, state by state

A federal judge struck down Alabama’s ban on gay marriage as unconstitutional on Friday, clearing the way for it to become the 37th state where gay marriage is legal.

Same-sex couples could be eligible to apply for marriage licenses as soon as clerks’ offices open on Saturday, gay rights groups said, after US district court Judge Callie Granade decided not to place a stay on her ruling.

Granade found that the ban does not further Alabama’s goal of protecting the ties between children and their biological parents, and that it is harmful to the children of same-sex parents.

“Those children currently being raised by same-sex parents in Alabama are just as worthy of protection and recognition by the state as are the children being raised by opposite-sex parents,” she wrote.

The ruling comes a week after the US supreme court agreed to decide whether states can ban gay marriage.

The supreme court’s ruling, which will stem from cases concerning marriage restrictions in Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee, is due by the end of June.

The Alabama case was brought by a lesbian couple legally married in California. The couple, Cari Searcy and Kimberly McKeand, sought for Searcy to be able to adopt McKeand’s biological son under a provision of Alabama law allowing for the adoption of a “spouse’s child.”

They lost their case in an Alabama probate court and a state appeals court before going to federal court.

“They are ecstatic. They are over-the-top happy about the ruling,” said Christine Cassie Hernandez, a lawyer representing the couple.

However, the Alabama attorney general’s office said in a statement that it plans to ask to have Granade’s ruling put on hold pending the supreme court’s decision.

Alabama governor Robert Bentley’s office expressed disappointment with the ruling.

“The people of Alabama voted in a constitutional amendment to define marriage between a man and a woman,” Jennifer Ardis, Bentley’s spokeswoman, said in a statement. “The governor is disappointed with the ruling today, and we will review the decision to decide the next steps.”

Gay rights advocates hailed the decision.

“Judge Granade’s ruling today affirms what we already know to be true - that all loving, committed Alabama couples should have the right to marry,” said Human Rights Campaign legal director Sarah Warbelow in a statement.

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed