Lunchtime summary
- May has defended the Conservative party’s response to the accusations that led to it receiving a record £70,000 fine for not properly declaring election expenses. At PMQs the SNP’s Pete Wishart asked:
Last week the Electoral Commission issued its largest-ever fine on the Conservative party for breaking vital and crucial election rules. What did the prime minister, the cabinet, her aides, know about any of this activity? Who was responsible for designing and signing off all of this? Do you agree with me that this is at best woeful negligence, and at worst pure electoral fraud?
May replied:
You are asking me to respond to what is a party matter, but I can assure you that the Conservative party did campaign in 2015 across the country for the return of a Conservative government, and we should be clear that such campaigning will be part of the party’s national return, not candidates’ local return, as the Electoral Commission itself has said.
The party accepted in April 2016 it had made an administrative error on its national spending, it brought that to the attention of the Electoral Commission in order to amend its national return.
As I say, national electoral spending is a question for the national party, not for individual members.
The Electoral Commission has looked into these issues, as it has for issues for the Liberal Democrat party and the Labour party. It has issued fines to all three parties and those fines will be paid.
- May has said that MPs will get a free vote on the proposals to decant from the House of Parliament to an alternative Westminster venue to allow multi-billion repair works to be carried out.
- Chris Grayling, the transport secretary, has told MPs that an “evolving threat” led to his decision to impose the laptop cabin ban on flights from some countries. In response to an urgent question in the Commons, he said:
We respond in aviation security to the evolving threat that we face from terrorists. And there are some things that we make public and others that we don’t. I’m not going to give [MPs] full details of the background to the decision we have taken. It is a response to an evolving threat ... Suffice to say to the House, we have taken the steps that we have taken for good reason.
- Tim Farron, the Lib Dem leader, renewed is call for a referendum on the final Brexit deal, saying David Davis, the Brexit secretary, backed the idea until quite recently. Proposing a 10-minute rule bill on this, Farron told MPs:
The secretary of state for Exiting the European Union not long ago made the case very eloquently for what is now the Liberal Democrat proposal. He used the phrases: ‘mandate referendum’, and ‘decision referendum’ ...
I couldn’t agree with the secretary of state more. It is a shame that the secretary of state doesn’t agree with himself anymore.
Farron was referring to this speech Davis gave in 2012.